引用本文:[点击复制]
[点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 7003次   下载 102 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
主管护师综合评价指标体系的信度与效度评价
0
()
摘要:
目的 检验主管护师综合评价指标体系(SNCEIS)的信度与效度,为建立科学的SNCEIS提供方法学指导。 方法 利用构建的SNCEIS对60名主管护师进行实测,验证SNCEIS的重测信度、内部一致性信度、评价者间信度、内容效度和结构效度。 结果 SNCEIS的重测信度为0.7 331~0.9 750,Cronbach α系数为0.935 6, 自评与他评分值的Pearson相关系数为0.763~0.881(P=0.000),信度较高。SNCEIS单变量与总变量的Pearson相关系数为0.330~0.812(P<0.05),内容效度满意;因子分析显示SNCEIS的结构效度良好。结论 SNCEIS具有较高的信度和效度,能够对主管护师进行较为公正、客观的综合评价。
关键词:  主管护师  综合评价  指标体系  信度  效度
DOI:
基金项目:
Study on Reliability and Validity of Supervisor Nurse Comprehensive Evaluation Index System
()
Abstract:
Objective To test the reliability and validity of supervisor nurse comprehensive evaluation index system(SNCEIS)in order to provide methodological advice for setting a scientific SNCEIS. Method The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, interrater reliability, content validity and construct validity of SNCEIS were examined based on 60 supervisor nurses. Result The test-retest reliability of SNCEIS was 0.733 1~0.975 0, its Cronbach α was 0.935 6. For interrater reliability, Pearson coefficient of self-evaluation score and other person evaluation score was 0.763~0.881(P=0.000).Content validity, Pearson coefficient of each item score and total score of SNCEIS was 0.330~0.812(P<0.05).The result of factor analysis showed SNCEIS had satisfactory construct validity. Conclusion SNCEIS had a fairly good reliability and validity. It could perform comprehensive evaluation objectively and fairly for supervisor nurse.
Key words:  

supervisor nurse,comprehensive evaluation, index system, reliability, validity

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫