| 摘要: |
| 《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》在解决医疗损害侵权案件中起了非常关键的作用，考虑到医疗行为是一个高风险行为，在有些情况下，即便医疗机构和医务人员不存在违法违规的过失行为，进行医疗活动也有可能发生患者人身损害的后果，立法者为了保护医生的合法权益，在《侵权责任法》第六十条规定了三种抗辩事由。但是在其立法技术上，第六十条却错误的使用了封闭列举免责事由，导致其在实践中的运用的非常困难，保护医生合法权益的立法目的的实现受到很大的限制。 |
| 关键词: 医疗损害责任 抗辩事由 立法技术 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Reflections on the 60 Defenses of Legislative Technique in Tort Liability Act |
|
| () |
| Abstract: |
| ? Tort Liability Act of the People’s Republic of China?has played a crucial role in resolving medical injury tort cases.Taking into account the health behavior is a high-risk behavior，in some cases, even the medical institutions and medical personnel is not illegal negligence, medical activities may occur in patients with the consequences of personal injury.The legitimate rights and interests of the legislators in order to protect doctors，article 60 provides for three defenses in the Tort Liability Act.But technically in its legislation, article 60 is the wrong use of the closed enumeration Disclaimer Subject, leading to its use in practice very difficult to achieve legislative purpose to protect the legitimate rights and interests of doctors under great restrictions. |
| Key words: medical liability for damage,defense cause,leislative technique |
