| 摘要: |
| 目的 构建有良好测量学属性的中文版本的脑卒中患者满意度量表，适用于对中国脑卒中患者的医疗服务满意度进行测量。方法 从上海市5家综合医院中随机抽取300位脑卒中患者进行问卷，得到280份有效问卷，回收率93.3%。运用主成分分析、KM0检验和巴特利球体检验及因子分析对量表进行测评，以此获得量表的信效度。结果 条目分析将条目16剔除；KMO指数为0.854，探索性因子分析验证量表修订版也包括两个因子：住院治疗服务满意度和居家康复服务满意度，两因子解释总变异的70.1%；验证性因子分析验证量表的各项拟合指标良好。中文版本脑卒中患者满意度量表得分总数与医疗服务满意度总分数显著正相关，与Barthel日常生活功能评估指数得分和自我健康功能评估得分低程度显著正相关。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.85，重测信度系数为0.83。结论 中文版本的脑卒中患者满意度量表信度和效度均良好，适用于国内脑卒中患者进行满意度的专门测量。 |
| 关键词: 脑卒中患者满意度量表 住院治疗 居家康复 信度 效度 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Research on the Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Patient Satisfaction with Stroke Care Scale(SASCS) |
|
| () |
| Abstract: |
|
Objective
To investigate the Chinese version of Patient Satisfaction with Stroke Care Scale(SASCS) for evaluating Chinese patients’ satisfaction with stroke care scale. Methods A sample of 300 stroke patients of 5 comprehensive hospitals in Shanghai City was randomly interviewed by questionnaire. The scale was evaluated by principal components analysis，KMO and Bartlett Test and factorial validity analysis so as to obtain the reliability and validity testing. Results Item analysis indicated that item 16 was omitted. The KMO Test was 0.854；EFA showed that the Chinese version of SASCS has 16 items with 2 factors (hospital satisfaction with stroke care and home satisfaction with stroke care) which explained of 70.1% total variance. CFA showed that the fit indices of the measurement model were improved. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.85 for the total scale. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.83. Conclusion It is suggested that the Chinese version of Patient Satisfaction with Stroke Care Scale has good reliability and validity，which could be used as a robust specified tool for measuring Chinese patients’ satisfaction with stroke care. |
| Key words: Satisfaction with Stroke Care Scale,inpatient treatment,home rehabilitation,reliability,validity |
